<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Geforce GTX 465 doesn’t sell well</title>
		<description>Discuss Geforce GTX 465 doesn’t sell well</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19492-geforce-gtx-465-doesn’t-sell-well</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:02:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19492/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>SiliconDoc says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19492-geforce-gtx-465-doesn’t-sell-well#comment-1459</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just like the 5830 was a dud, but now, the red roosters are getting all behind it trying to compare it to the GTX460. LOL How times change. The GTX460 slams the power hungry and hot 5830, which by the way, was exactly why the red roosters claimed it wasn't all that - while they were whining about GTX470 and GTX480 power and heat, they couldn't support a crippled 5780 called the 5830 that was hotter and more power hungry than the faster than it 5850. Now, the 5850 is the real equivalent to the GTX460, but the red roosters have to promo their dud card, the 5830, as "the competition". LOL]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SiliconDoc</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 02:43:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19492-geforce-gtx-465-doesn’t-sell-well#comment-1459</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>macblastin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19492-geforce-gtx-465-doesn’t-sell-well#comment-1035</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It wouldn't take a genius to figure out the GTX 465 was a dud.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>macblastin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:21:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19492-geforce-gtx-465-doesn’t-sell-well#comment-1035</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
