<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Half Windows 7 installs are 64-bit</title>
		<description>Discuss Half Windows 7 installs are 64-bit</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:20:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19428/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-889</link>
			<description><![CDATA[More realistically, lack of 64bit software isn't much of a concern outside the Windows world. The few 64 bit apps I run under XP x64 are 7-Zip, Media Player Classic Home Cinema, ffdshow, Wireshark, VMware and VirtualDub. On the Windows side of things even the open source projects have been slow to make 64bit binaries available.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:33:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-889</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peciura says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-881</link>
			<description><![CDATA[3+GB of RAM is an absolute must for nowdays and lack of memory is the main speed bottleneck. I don't like using swap file, because it is slow and i care about my HDD. Just started Win7 consumes 1.3GB after a while it eats 2+GB. So on 32bits there is left about 1GB - that is not enough for my mom when she is browsing internet. I use 2+ browsers for web development (Firefox for developing, Opera for documentation,... ). FF with its plugins consumes up to 900MB, other browsers, text editors 200-300MB each. And there is simply not enought memory when i want to open Dreamweaver to find invalid html code. Conclusion - if you are using WinXP - 32bit and 2-3GB of RAM is enough; if you want Win7 - buy 64bit edition and use all 4+GB.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peciura</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 22:49:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-881</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nt300 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-879</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 x64 all the way. Nothing like 8GB to 16GB of DDR2/3 ram to help crunch video decoding/encoding. Buying the 32-bit version of Win 7 is a waste of money IMO. Now all we need to see is games take full advantage of 64-bit computing. It's way long overdue.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nt300</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 22:26:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-879</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>love_linux says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-870</link>
			<description><![CDATA[8) Slow adoption it true only in the Windows world. For the rest of the souls that ware brave enough to try other operating systems (Fedora in my case) they have more then 95 of the software designed to run on 64 bit. It is true that Adobe is painfully slow in releasing a stable 64 bit version for Flash but the wrapper that is designed to enable flash 32 on firebox 64 it works perfectly.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>love_linux</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:53:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-870</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fud_u says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-866</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They really step up with Win7. It's beautiful.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fud_u</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:19:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-866</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-862</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Only half? I have seen tons of cheap mainstream computers shipping with 64bit.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:38:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-862</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-861</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AFAIK, Win 7 64 can run 32-bit apps. So why not use it?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 22:59:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-861</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-858</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's won't matter how much ram your mb takes... I have one that runs Win 7 x64 on a 2GB Brisbane just fine. Most of the times it has 1.3 GB of free Memory if you'll disable the super prefetch. And LOL... all the n00bs buried my post. Well, fact of the mater is that with "more" than enough ram you can do a lot, just that some lack the idea what.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:27:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-858</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-851</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Probably because they included both 32bit and 64bit discs, people are not hesitating to try out the 64bit version now that Microsoft is providing both version for the price of one, I'm still using the 32bit version, but that's only because this shitty motherboard doesn't take more than 2GB of RAM]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:31:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-851</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-849</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Little point? Since we did you start to write dumb articles?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:22:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19428-half-windows-7-installs-are-64-bit#comment-849</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
