<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Sandy Bridge to have DDR3 1333 support</title>
		<description>Discuss Sandy Bridge to have DDR3 1333 support</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19378-sandy-bridge-to-have-ddr3-1333-support</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 07:20:26 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19378/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Nerdfighter says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19378-sandy-bridge-to-have-ddr3-1333-support#comment-786</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A bit disappointing, considering that Bulldozer will have native DDR3-1866 support.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdfighter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:24:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19378-sandy-bridge-to-have-ddr3-1333-support#comment-786</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JWellington says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19378-sandy-bridge-to-have-ddr3-1333-support#comment-726</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looks like they don't want to put more pressure on the Internal Memory Controller; they have enough things loaded into that chip, including the PCI-E connector.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JWellington</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:11:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19378-sandy-bridge-to-have-ddr3-1333-support#comment-726</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
