<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>GTX 460 listed in Europe</title>
		<description>Discuss GTX 460 listed in Europe</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:17:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19357/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland#comment-656</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nvidia's chips yield if far form perfect... "unnecessary" is a naive understatement.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:53:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland#comment-656</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>steddy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland#comment-655</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ CRoland Considering the clock speeds, I would imagine it would perform at about the same level as the GTX 465. I think the 465 will be replaced by the 460. I suspect that the 465 was a tool to use some of the defective chips, and, as TSMC's yields improve, they will become unnecessary and will gradually disappear.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>steddy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:24:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland#comment-655</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nforce4max says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland#comment-649</link>
			<description><![CDATA[200 is a lot for a card that is going to under perform the 58x0 and older gen cards. This is why people are buying new ati cards or sticking with what they have already.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nforce4max</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:48:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland#comment-649</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SolidSteel144 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland#comment-646</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So when do we get the full 384 SPU version?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SolidSteel144</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:47:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland#comment-646</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CRoland says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland#comment-637</link>
			<description><![CDATA[To be between 5830 and 5850 is should be at least as fast as 465, which sounds unlikely given the naming scheme. I hope that's true, though. The market segments needs competition, bad.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CRoland</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 19:23:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19357-gtx-460-listed-in-euroland#comment-637</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
