<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD to continue with Triple cores</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD to continue with Triple cores</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 09:41:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19333/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>JWellington says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-608</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I can't wait to see how these things fold.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JWellington</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:10:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-608</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-602</link>
			<description><![CDATA[On paper, yes... but in-store availability not until H2. Isn't that what counts?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:38:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-602</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-601</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hmmm... terrace215, anything else you can share with us? 8) You must have seen that AMD still has the Bulldozer slated for H1 2011]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:15:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-601</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>terrace215 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-591</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@bernard Especially as Bulldozer appears to just now have first silicon. Not gonna launch until 2nd half of 2011.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>terrace215</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:54:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-591</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-579</link>
			<description><![CDATA[...and AMD will have to keep selling Athlon II and Phenom II tri-cores well into 2011, as the transistion to Bulldozer is phased in.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:34:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-579</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>anno says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-572</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Faud, as you should know, Bulldozer is all about tightly integrating two cores, to enable a strong performance boost for multithreaded workloads at a small increase in space and power. Since these cores are so tightly integrated, there's no way there will be a triple core Bulldozer. Triple MODULE maybe, but that's a six CORE. AMD was probably talking about Llano, they have a 3 core running already]]></description>
			<dc:creator>anno</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:42:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19333-amd-to-continue-with-triple-cores#comment-572</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
