<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>The GTX 460 1GB to be around  €30 more expensive</title>
		<description>Discuss The GTX 460 1GB to be around  €30 more expensive</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19326-the-gtx-460-1gb-to-be-around-€30-more-expensive</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:25:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19326/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19326-the-gtx-460-1gb-to-be-around-€30-more-expensive#comment-603</link>
			<description><![CDATA[don't you mean minimum loss?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:56:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19326-the-gtx-460-1gb-to-be-around-€30-more-expensive#comment-603</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JWellington says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19326-the-gtx-460-1gb-to-be-around-€30-more-expensive#comment-573</link>
			<description><![CDATA[NVidia is binning chips for maximum profitability. This isn't even the full GF104 chip, leaving them room to spare. My guess is they don't want to encroach upon the GTX 470's territory.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JWellington</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:46:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19326-the-gtx-460-1gb-to-be-around-€30-more-expensive#comment-573</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
