<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD to talk Bulldozer at Hot Chips conference</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD to talk Bulldozer at Hot Chips conference</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:00:21 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19252/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>AMD says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-361</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I guess there will be nothing over 500]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AMD</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:15:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-361</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dhoom says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[it wont be x86 right??? n finally good news that AMD might come up with a very good chip. its too important to keep prices low(no 1000$ processors..).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dhoom</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:12:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-352</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-348</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, ever since K8 Intel has had an upper hand, so I guess it's ok to say either...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:31:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-348</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>azrael says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-346</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wouldn't it be more correct to say that Intel has dominated the market since the Conroe days? As far as I recall the K8 architecture wiped the floor with anything Intel had to offer at the time. That being said I wish AMD the best with the new architecture. Competition and choice is always welcome.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>azrael</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:17:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-346</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Serge says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-344</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Now this is something I have been waiting for...Bobcat and Bulldozer seem like something to be excited about...the architecture seems quite interesting, especially the hardware/software accelerated "hyper threading"...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Serge</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:53:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-344</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>guideX says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-341</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fudzilla stuff, Great article (once again) but your article rating thing seems to be faulty, it keeps showing '(131 votes)' for every post.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>guideX</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:41:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19252-amd-to-talk-bulldozer-at-hot-chips-conference#comment-341</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
