<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel releases fastest dual core i3</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel releases fastest dual core i3</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:12:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19199/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Calabros says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3#comment-374</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i feel beside website redesign, your language in writing articles has been changed too. maybe I'm wrong but I'd prefer Street Talking kind of Fudzilla]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Calabros</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:51:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3#comment-374</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3#comment-254</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD is doing the same with their Athlon II line: deliberately holding back on clock speed so as let Phenom II have the exclusivity of faster clock speeds. Intel is politely waiting for AMD to catch up a bit. AMD is dragging its feet by slowly increasing clock speeds each quarter, since Bulldozer won't be available for almost a year]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:20:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3#comment-254</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dhoom says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3#comment-248</link>
			<description><![CDATA[its just a way of marketing, they wont launch faster products even if they can, so that they can launch it later as a new one or wait till AMD launches some competitive product...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dhoom</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:42:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3#comment-248</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3#comment-240</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD do this, but with success (PII X4 955, 965 etc)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:59:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3#comment-240</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Serge says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3#comment-232</link>
			<description><![CDATA[basically they added another multiplier and voila, new CPU...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Serge</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:41:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19199-intel-releases-fastest-dual-core-i3#comment-232</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
